**********************************************************************************************
**                                                                                          **
**                                         SNPs&GO                                          **
**                  Predicting disease associated variation using GO terms                  **
**                                                                                          **
**********************************************************************************************

      Sequence File: PRKCH_HUMAN.seq

      Mutation     Prediction   RI  Probability   Method
          P66S        Disease    4        0.723   PhD-SNP:  F[P]=99%  F[S]=0%   Nali=74
          P66S   Unclassified   NA           NA   PANTHER:  F[P]=NA   F[S]=NA
          P66S        Neutral    0        0.494   SNPs&GO

         R596H        Disease    6        0.783   PhD-SNP:  F[R]=100% F[H]=0%   Nali=1017
         R596H        Disease   10        1.000   PANTHER:  F[R]=99%  F[H]=0%  
         R596H        Disease    4        0.703   SNPs&GO

         F614C        Disease    8        0.879   PhD-SNP:  F[F]=95%  F[C]=0%   Nali=985
         F614C        Disease   10        0.986   PANTHER:  F[F]=91%  F[C]=0%  
         F614C        Disease    6        0.784   SNPs&GO


      Mutation: WT+POS+NEW
      WT:  Residue in wild-type protein
      POS: Residue position
      NEW: New residue after mutation
      Prediction:
             Neutral: Neutral variation
             Disease: Disease associated variation
      RI: Reliability Index
      Probability: Disease probability (if >0.5 mutation is predicted Disease)
      Method: SVM type and data
             PANTHER: Output of the PANTHER algorithm
             PhD-SNP:  SVM input is the sequence and profile at the mutated position
             SNPs&GO:  SVM input is all the input in PhD-SNP, PANTHER  and GO term features
      F[X]: Frequency of residue X in the sequence profile
      Nali: Number of aligned sequences in the mutated site

**********************************************************************************************
**                                                                                          **
**     Calabrese R, Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Martelli PL, Casadio R. (2009). Functional    **
**     annotations improve the predictive score of human disease-related mutations in       **
**     proteins. Human Mutation. 30:1237-1244.                                              **
**                                                                                          **
**     Capriotti E, Altman RB. (2011). Improving the prediction of disease-related vari-    **
**     ants using protein three-dimensional structure. BMC Bioinformatics. 12 (Sup.4) S3.   **
**                                                                                          **
**********************************************************************************************