********************************************************************************************** ** ** ** SNPs&GO ** ** Predicting disease associated variation using GO terms ** ** ** ********************************************************************************************** Sequence File: PRKCH_HUAMAN.seq Mutation Prediction RI Probability Method R286P Disease 7 0.855 PhD-SNP: F[R]=46% F[P]=1% Nali=281 R286P Disease 6 0.782 PANTHER: F[R]=30% F[P]=1% R286P Disease 4 0.725 SNPs&GO G367W Disease 9 0.928 PhD-SNP: F[G]=87% F[W]=0% Nali=1039 G367W Disease 10 0.985 PANTHER: F[G]=65% F[W]=0% G367W Disease 6 0.803 SNPs&GO D497Y Disease 9 0.957 PhD-SNP: F[D]=100% F[Y]=0% Nali=1065 D497Y Disease 10 1.000 PANTHER: F[D]=99% F[Y]=0% D497Y Disease 8 0.907 SNPs&GO Mutation: WT+POS+NEW WT: Residue in wild-type protein POS: Residue position NEW: New residue after mutation Prediction: Neutral: Neutral variation Disease: Disease associated variation RI: Reliability Index Probability: Disease probability (if >0.5 mutation is predicted Disease) Method: SVM type and data PANTHER: Output of the PANTHER algorithm PhD-SNP: SVM input is the sequence and profile at the mutated position SNPs&GO: SVM input is all the input in PhD-SNP, PANTHER and GO term features F[X]: Frequency of residue X in the sequence profile Nali: Number of aligned sequences in the mutated site ********************************************************************************************** ** ** ** Calabrese R, Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Martelli PL, Casadio R. (2009). Functional ** ** annotations improve the predictive score of human disease-related mutations in ** ** proteins. Human Mutation. 30:1237-1244. ** ** ** ** Capriotti E, Altman RB. (2011). Improving the prediction of disease-related vari- ** ** ants using protein three-dimensional structure. BMC Bioinformatics. 12 (Sup.4) S3. ** ** ** **********************************************************************************************